I've noticed that CMSMS outputs XHTML 1.0 Transitional by default, as do at least some of its extensions (e.g., FormBuilder and CGFeedMaker). I searched the forums regarding CMSMS' use of XHTML, finding a lot of things that weren't quite what I was looking for. The closest I got was:
- * CMS Made Simple and XHTML (Jan 2007)
- * Is XHTML always the right solution? (Aug 2005 - May 2007)
- * HTML 4 module (Sep 2006)
- * Are we sending the wrong Mime type? (Jul 2006)
Why XHTML?
I'm not asking whether XHTML or HTML is inherently better than the other or anything, I'm just curious what the reasoning is behind the choice. If I've made a mistake somewhere in my post, please lead me to correct information.
Thanks for working on CMSMS! It's grown on me, especially after some poor experiences with Joomla and WordPress.