XHTML or HTML?

General project discussion. NOT for help questions.
Post Reply
RytoEX
Forum Members
Forum Members
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:32 am

XHTML or HTML?

Post by RytoEX »

Wasn't sure whether to post this in here, Product Support, or Developers Discussion, but I figured General Discussion wouldn't necessarily be wrong.  In case it's relevant, I'm using CMSMS 1.6.6.

I've noticed that CMSMS outputs XHTML 1.0 Transitional by default, as do at least some of its extensions (e.g., FormBuilder and CGFeedMaker).  I searched the forums regarding CMSMS' use of XHTML, finding a lot of things that weren't quite what I was looking for.  The closest I got was: As you can see, the topics in question are quite old.  One even mentions "XHTML 2.0", which has been abandoned by the W3C in favor of (X)HTML 5.  CMSMS also does not appear to use the "application/xhtml+xml" Content Type, which is, for all I can tell, the only way to reap the benefits of XHTML.  If this is the case, then I have a question:

Why XHTML?

I'm not asking whether XHTML or HTML is inherently better than the other or anything, I'm just curious what the reasoning is behind the choice.  If I've made a mistake somewhere in my post, please lead me to correct information.

Thanks for working on CMSMS!  It's grown on me, especially after some poor experiences with Joomla and WordPress.
Last edited by RytoEX on Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
FormBuilder Developer (former Admin)
FormBrowser Developer and Admin
User avatar
Dr.CSS
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 12711
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:32 am

Re: XHTML or HTML?

Post by Dr.CSS »

It most likely was the choice of the knuckle head who built them...
RytoEX
Forum Members
Forum Members
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:32 am

Re: XHTML or HTML?

Post by RytoEX »

Dr.CSS wrote: It most likely was the choice of the knuckle head who built them...
Sorry.  That would mean?   ???
FormBuilder Developer (former Admin)
FormBrowser Developer and Admin
JohnnyB
Dev Team Member
Dev Team Member
Posts: 731
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:05 pm

Re: XHTML or HTML?

Post by JohnnyB »

Why XHTML?
I think a lot of people fell into the bandwagon of using xhtml when it really isn't justified.  I wish cmsms was HTML and when I first starting using CMSMS I rewrote core files so I could write using HTML (strict).  But, I realized it wasn't really worth the extra time in the end and I reluctantly followed masses.  I think it would be important for CMSMS to become HTML (strict) so an easier transition to HTML 5 can occur.  The new 2.0 release would be perfect timing for this :)
"The art of life lies in a constant readjustment to our surroundings." -Okakura Kakuzo

--
LinkedIn profile
--
I only speak/write in English so I may not translate well on International posts.
--
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”