WYSIWYG
Re: WYSIWYG
Pasting into WYSIWYGs is off by default in Firefox as a security thing. It is possible to turn them back on, though you'll have to google how to do it...
Re: WYSIWYG
Oh, ok..I'll have to turn it on then...I do not know what is right anymore because I am running CMSMS as a fusion of beta and normal release! I'll fix that when B3 comes out. And then some problems are solved I think.
Thanks / Gnolen
Thanks / Gnolen
Re: WYSIWYG
Seems like FCKEditor has released its 2.0FC (Final Candidate) with a number of improvements.
Megabob, would you consider adapting the module to this new release?
Jon
Megabob, would you consider adapting the module to this new release?
Jon
Re: WYSIWYG
Surejah wrote: Seems like FCKEditor has released its 2.0FC (Final Candidate) with a number of improvements.
Megabob, would you consider adapting the module to this new release?
Jon

Re: WYSIWYG
And while you're there do you think you could inlcude in the Help a paragraph on how to get your own stylers to appear in the drop-down menu? It wasa real pain discovering that there are two files - a CSS and an XML document. I just pasted my CSS into both. Changing the path seemd like more of a drag (especially if your CSS only exists in your templates.
What I love most about this editor is that it actually works. FCK and bulletmenu have really made CMSMS so much better.
What I love most about this editor is that it actually works. FCK and bulletmenu have really made CMSMS so much better.
Re: WYSIWYG
I will tryiNSiPiD wrote: And while you're there do you think you could inlcude in the Help a paragraph on how to get your own stylers to appear in the drop-down menu? It wasa real pain discovering that there are two files - a CSS and an XML document. I just pasted my CSS into both. Changing the path seemd like more of a drag (especially if your CSS only exists in your templates.
What I love most about this editor is that it actually works. FCK and bulletmenu have really made CMSMS so much better.

However before to do something, i am waiting next realase of CMSMS, and waiting a period of less work.
Bye

Re: WYSIWYG
Megabob...Did you have the time to take a peak at the 2.0FC? Would it be hard to implement in the new CMS version do you think? Would be great if it did!
/ gnolen
/ gnolen
Re: WYSIWYG
Don't worry when new realese of CMSMS will be available in max 2 week 2.0FC will be useablegnolen wrote: Megabob...Did you have the time to take a peak at the 2.0FC? Would it be hard to implement in the new CMS version do you think? Would be great if it did!
/ gnolen

Re: WYSIWYG
No need to google it - here's the description from http://www.mozilla.org/editor/midasdemo ... prefs.htmlwishy wrote: Pasting into WYSIWYGs is off by default in Firefox as a security thing. It is possible to turn them back on, though you'll have to google how to do it...
Setting Prefs for the Mozilla Rich Text Editing Demo
To protect users' private information, unprivileged scripts cannot invoke the Cut, Copy, and Paste commands in the Mozilla rich text editor, so the corresponding buttons on the Mozilla Rich Text Editing demo page will not work. To enable these functions for purposes of the demo, you must modify your browser preferences.
1. Quit Mozilla. If you have Quick Launch running (in Windows, an icon in the toolbar), quit that too.
2. Find your Mozilla profile directory. On Windows, this is often located in c://WINNT/Profiles//Application Data/Mozilla. (See also editing configuration files for more info on locating your profile folder.)
3. Open the user.js file from that directory in a text editor. If there's no user.js file, create one.
4. Add these lines to user.js:
Code: Select all
user_pref("capability.policy.policynames", "allowclipboard");
user_pref("capability.policy.allowclipboard.sites", "http://www.mozilla.org");
user_pref("capability.policy.allowclipboard.Clipboard.cutcopy", "allAccess");
user_pref("capability.policy.allowclipboard.Clipboard.paste", "allAccess");
Re: WYSIWYG
Does someone has a complete working WYSIWYG in the beta4 version.
The standard TinyMCE version can't insert the picture's correct...
and the HTMLArea isn't combatible with the because the options tab isn't hide (also not FireFox combatible)
Hopefully someone has an sollution.
Tnx
The standard TinyMCE version can't insert the picture's correct...
and the HTMLArea isn't combatible with the because the options tab isn't hide (also not FireFox combatible)
Hopefully someone has an sollution.
Tnx
Re: WYSIWYG
It should work, but I don't agree that it's the best solution. The styles dropdown is based on an xml file and not just parsing the stylesheet. Since we try to push standards, styles should be pretty important.
And, yes, I know about the TinyMCE thing. As soon as I get some time to dedicate, I'll fix it.
And, yes, I know about the TinyMCE thing. As soon as I get some time to dedicate, I'll fix it.
Re: WYSIWYG
Hmm, fck parses classes correctly alright. Just as a normal class...Or do I see wrong? And the content(with some CSS from fck) comes out 100% valid..I just feel that the fck is the most userfriendly one..