CMSMS - an Editor's viewpoint?
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:27 pm
I am just in the early first few days of getting to know CMSMS and have been impressed so far by what I have seen. I come from a technical background, but am by no means experienced with PHP. Nevertheless, what I have found so far from my technical understanding has been very good.
I am researching various CMS tools on behalf of my employer but also myself. To this end, I have been testing CMSMS alongside Mambo, Joomla and TypO3. Although it is early days, so far CMSMS is leading for me. I like the simplicity of the design and its ease of use. Right from installing it was clear to me how I could go into admin and change things around.
What I think seems to be overlooked though in the design of many of the CMS tools I have looked at, is that perhaps a CMS is of most use to the non-technical. Techies for example can build and maintain a website using something like Dreamweaver, but for a non-techie having a CMS website is the only option.
A CMS can do all sorts of fabulous things and have all sorts of bells and whistles, but if adding content is clunky and unintuitive for an editor with no or little technical knowledge, then it sort of misses the point for me of having a CMS. For the non-technical, the first question I think would be is, "How easy is it for me to add and update content and maintain my site?" Or am I missing the point?
For me, so far as I have seen, CMSMS scores highly in that department. I haven't so far seen one that is better. I know asking this is likely draw answers that are coloured in favour of CMSMS, but is that the genuine view of others? Are there other CMS tools out there with good UIs for editors that share the capability of CMSMS for the admin/developer too? Or is CMSMS genuinelly king of the CMS jungle?
I would be interested to hear your thoughts?
I am researching various CMS tools on behalf of my employer but also myself. To this end, I have been testing CMSMS alongside Mambo, Joomla and TypO3. Although it is early days, so far CMSMS is leading for me. I like the simplicity of the design and its ease of use. Right from installing it was clear to me how I could go into admin and change things around.
What I think seems to be overlooked though in the design of many of the CMS tools I have looked at, is that perhaps a CMS is of most use to the non-technical. Techies for example can build and maintain a website using something like Dreamweaver, but for a non-techie having a CMS website is the only option.
A CMS can do all sorts of fabulous things and have all sorts of bells and whistles, but if adding content is clunky and unintuitive for an editor with no or little technical knowledge, then it sort of misses the point for me of having a CMS. For the non-technical, the first question I think would be is, "How easy is it for me to add and update content and maintain my site?" Or am I missing the point?
For me, so far as I have seen, CMSMS scores highly in that department. I haven't so far seen one that is better. I know asking this is likely draw answers that are coloured in favour of CMSMS, but is that the genuine view of others? Are there other CMS tools out there with good UIs for editors that share the capability of CMSMS for the admin/developer too? Or is CMSMS genuinelly king of the CMS jungle?
I would be interested to hear your thoughts?