whishy, I don't think you're losing your mind. In fact, I think I've found an explanation...wishy wrote: Well, this is the first time I actually got around to looking at the problem. I actually haven't touched nils73's code yet...
So, that leads me back to: Am I losing my mind?![]()
In fact, I base the first post of this thread on the code generated by a demo version of cmsms (I can't remember if this is the demo cmsms website, or the one from opensourcecms.com) which is an old version of cmsms.
I think, the code had been corrected in en 0.9 or the 0.10 version...
Have you now found back your mind ?

Ploc
Edit : I've juste checked the demo version of cmsms website, the html code seems to be ok. I must have been smoke... (or the wrong html code came from opensourcecms.com...)
Anway, the last posts are still valid; but the firsts ones can be ignored I think...