Re: Major frustration - can't install - 404 errors
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 3:49 pm
Brent,
Just wanted to get back about Dreamhost. My client provided an FTP-only account, with Mysql etc. I was able to upload my client's CMS installation and database, modify the config (/home/username/www.domain.com), and shazam! It worked.
Did you get yours working?
One thing I noticed is that you have to let hosting folders be created by the control panel. I thought I could just create a subdomain folder and that it would just start working, but no. I also noticed there can be a lot of latency and propagation time after a domain or subdomain is created, but after a couple hours it seems to be happy.
All in all, I prefer to work with webservers I can get an ssh terminal on, and Dreamhost doesn't seem to allow that. And doing everything by FTP is slow, plus it's insecure. Overrall, though, for the price and the features, Dreamhost is quite decent. Performance isn't very good, though that's more likely due to CMS's startup needs.
To deal with that, I'm going to try some of the mod_rewrite stuff being discussed elsewhere on the forum.
Cheers,
-sloop
Just wanted to get back about Dreamhost. My client provided an FTP-only account, with Mysql etc. I was able to upload my client's CMS installation and database, modify the config (/home/username/www.domain.com), and shazam! It worked.
Did you get yours working?
One thing I noticed is that you have to let hosting folders be created by the control panel. I thought I could just create a subdomain folder and that it would just start working, but no. I also noticed there can be a lot of latency and propagation time after a domain or subdomain is created, but after a couple hours it seems to be happy.
All in all, I prefer to work with webservers I can get an ssh terminal on, and Dreamhost doesn't seem to allow that. And doing everything by FTP is slow, plus it's insecure. Overrall, though, for the price and the features, Dreamhost is quite decent. Performance isn't very good, though that's more likely due to CMS's startup needs.
To deal with that, I'm going to try some of the mod_rewrite stuff being discussed elsewhere on the forum.
Cheers,
-sloop