http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% ... or%2F1.606
I didn't agree at the beginning, but... Isn't so bad to have a correct code.

It turns out that Mark thought {page_image} was included in 1.5.1 because of the change log. It will actually be part of 1.5.2 when it is released. You can test it with the current SVN if you wish.aozuas wrote: Hi, mark, just adding my voice to tyman00: Do you have a custom UDT you are using for page_image?
M@rtijn wrote: This is a community. This means that we work together and have the same goal (a beautiful CMS), not that we try to put people down and make their (voluntary) job as difficult as can be.