We really need someone to head up the documentation effort. Unfortunately, the project is too big and cumbersome at this point to get the main devs to do it. There just aren't enough hours in the day to code, answer email/forums, adminster the server(well, that's me) and all the other bits that go into it. Not to mention the day jobs, families and other addicitions that don't require a text editor.
I'm willing to take volunteers to get the documentation in order, but it's just such a suck job and requires a bit of finesse. I have resources to allocate to people to get them what they need to do this. I just don't have the time to do it myself...
Topic Subjects need to be Relevant
Re: Topic Subjects need to be Relevant
I would love to help out in the documentation/wiki side of things.
Nullig
Nullig
Re: Topic Subjects need to be Relevant
Hello,
But don't worry : everybody liking CMSms, read my above suggestions (a few posts above) to improve the wiki : layout, updates, project, [solved], already answered, troubleshooting, modules. Pick one forum post about one of these categories and wiki it. You are done and you have become a project contributor.
Pierre
Amen.SonniesEdge wrote: I'd like to see (...) any solved answers accompanied by "I've added this to the wiki".
So am I, as everybody who doesn't improve some wiki content (s)he think could be improved.SonniesEdge wrote: I know that this is easier said than done, and I'm as guilty as others in this area!
But don't worry : everybody liking CMSms, read my above suggestions (a few posts above) to improve the wiki : layout, updates, project, [solved], already answered, troubleshooting, modules. Pick one forum post about one of these categories and wiki it. You are done and you have become a project contributor.
Pierre