• twitter image
  • facebook image
  • youtube image
  • linkedin image
Language: CMS Made Simple Czech CMS Made Simple France CMS Made Simple Spain CMS Made Simple Hungary CMS Made Simple Russia CMS Made Simple Netherlands

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 6:05 pm 
Offline
Forum Members
Forum Members

Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:57 pm
Posts: 15
I am using CMSMS 1.5.4 and have installed CGBlog 1.0.1. I am attempting to use the blog but I having a little difficulty.

The first problem is absence of any indication as to the tag that should be applied. There is a long list of parameters but parameters to what? I tried a number of guesses but nothing worked.

The second mystery is the 'field definitions'. Great, we can enter field definitions. But to what end? What are they to be used for? Maybe they are for comments to the blog. If it is to provide a 'Comment' option, how is it used? If not, how are we to provide users with the ability to leave a Comment?

Would someone be good enough to shed some light on these rather basic issues?

Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 6:06 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:39 pm
Posts: 2154
Location: Lewiston-Idaho
{CGBlog} should work... but yes I didn't see it either...

Hope that helps

Cheers
jeremyBass

_________________
Sorry. Too little support in projects, too little reason to not deprioritize. May-be if more attention is needed.
Follow me on Twitter | Follow me on FaceBook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 6:35 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:02 pm
Posts: 1903
darkknight wrote:
The first problem is absence of any indication as to the tag that should be applied.

I'm with jeremybass - I would guess {CGBlogs} should call the module for you.

darkknight wrote:
The second mystery is the 'field definitions'. Great, we can enter field definitions. But to what end? What are they to be used for?

A common use of a field definition would be to allow the author to attach an image or file to the blog entry.

darkknight wrote:
If not, how are we to provide users with the ability to leave a Comment?

Use a module designed for this, like http://dev.cmsmadesimple.org/projects/comments or http://dev.cmsmadesimple.org/projects/cgfeedback or http://dev.cmsmadesimple.org/projects/dlcomments


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 7:14 pm 
Offline
Forum Members
Forum Members

Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:57 pm
Posts: 15
Thanks Jeremy

It's working this time. {CGBlog} was the first one I tried but smarty just barfed up an error. This time however, smarty behaved and returned an empty blog entry in the html code. I will test out a few things to see if I can get it to deliver the goods.

Again, thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 7:21 pm 
Offline
Dev Team Member
Dev Team Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:29 pm
Posts: 4977
Location: Raalte, the Netherlands
darkknight,

The field-definitions are free fields that can be used to show as an extra field in the Blog, so like an image, text.....

For the option to get feedback from users, you can install CGFeedback f.e. that will give the option for having feedback on the Blogs.

Calling          {CGBlog action="browsecat"} will show the archives....


Ronny


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2009 8:01 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 9:02 pm
Posts: 1903
darkknight wrote:
Thanks Jeremy

It's working this time. {CGBlog} was the first one I tried but smarty just barfed up an error. This time however, smarty behaved and returned an empty blog entry in the html code. I will test out a few things to see if I can get it to deliver the goods.

Again, thanks


I've found that the tags are case-sensitive, so {CGBlogs} should work but {CgBlogs} or {cgblogs} probably won't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2009 4:03 am 
Offline
Forum Members
Forum Members

Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:57 pm
Posts: 15
RonnyK, thanks

I appreciate the insights into how this module works. The 'help' that comes with the module is a little vague on some of the capabilities. Your post helps a lot.

Again, thanks to you and all who replied to the initial posting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 3:23 pm 
Offline
Forum Members
Forum Members

Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:32 pm
Posts: 78
Hi.

I'm using this module and can't seem to get the categories to work.

I am using this tag:
{CGBlogs catergory="Test"}
and nothing appears,

If I use the follwing tag:
{CGBlogs catergories="Test"}
Everything appears, not just the blogs in the Test category.

Is there a way to seperate them out, so that different bloggers can have their own page?
Also do I need to add different tags to show archives and add feedback?

Is anyone using this module at the moment and is it any better then Blog Made Simple?

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:52 pm 
Offline
Forum Members
Forum Members

Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:57 pm
Posts: 15
Hi Charmie

There are several posts regarding the 'category/categories' problem. The author uploaded a new version on the forge yesterday and that may provide a cure.

I have tried both BlogMadeSimple and CGBlog. I combined CGBlog is CGFeedback (as was suggested by a poster) to get a reasonable small scale blog.

CGBlog still has some rough edges.  One is that I can not get 'pretty urls' to function on links from the blog. I have read all the info provided and it still will not give a url that is not just a long line of page parameters. I did notice that the authors site does not have this problem but that may be due to using mod_rewrite rather than the internal 'pretty url'.

Another may be the category issue you mentioned.

If blogging is a big part of your site, you may want to think of WordPress. But be prepared to invest some time in learning how to use it. Otherwise, CGBlog is a useful, small scale, blog.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2009 10:01 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 5:59 pm
Posts: 908
Location: Mandan, ND
The version of CGBlog you are running is from early development. There have been some significant upgrades to the module that should be released soon. Keep an eye out for it!

_________________
If all else fails, use a bigger hammer.

M@rtijn wrote:
This is a community. This means that we work together and have the same goal (a beautiful CMS), not that we try to put people down and make their (voluntary) job as difficult as can be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 4:46 am 
Offline
Forum Members
Forum Members

Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2005 6:57 pm
Posts: 15
Hi tyman00

When I started this post I was using CGBlog 1.01. Within a few hours of CGBlog 1.2 being released at the forge I downloaded and installed it.

Unfortunately, the problems referred to in my last post persist.

'categories' vs' category' - if you use 'category in the template (as in the default template), you get nothing but a blank space; if you substitute 'categories' you get 'Array'. 'categories' is moving in the right direction but not there yet.

Same with the long query string after index? on links away from the blog module. There is no conversion to 'pretty url'. On the default Summary Template the following code is used:



I would change {$entry->detail_url} to something else to get a 'pretty url'  if I knew what that 'something else' should be. I have found nothing in the default templates to help.

Despite these bugs, CGBlog is quite good and meets my needs. The authors hard work is appreciated.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 5:46 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 5:59 pm
Posts: 908
Location: Mandan, ND
darkknight - CGBlogs was released earlier than I think was expected so there were still kinks to work out, since it was released with some issues I think that is why 1.2 came out. There is however another version that is still going to be released soon. I am not sure if it addresses your issues or not (haven't been trying it myself) but I remember them discussing some stuff like this. Keep waiting it should come soon.

_________________
If all else fails, use a bigger hammer.

M@rtijn wrote:
This is a community. This means that we work together and have the same goal (a beautiful CMS), not that we try to put people down and make their (voluntary) job as difficult as can be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Mon Jun 08, 2009 5:40 pm 
Offline
Forum Members
Forum Members

Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:11 pm
Posts: 34
hi,

i use the action "browsecat" and the category-list is displayed perfectly. but: if a category-link is clicked, ALL posts will be shown. instead of just the few posts which are part of the clicked category.

maybe it's a bug, or i did something wrong. my code is:

Code:
  {foreach from=$categories item='one'}
  <li><a href="{$one.url}" title="{$one.name}">{$one.name}</a> ({$one.count})</li>
  {/foreach}


thx a lot for your help!!

best regards,
tom


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2009 9:36 pm 
Offline
Forum Members
Forum Members
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:25 am
Posts: 52
Location: Victoria, BC
I'm having the same issue with browsecat, it shows all entries no matter what category is clicked. Any suggestions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: CGBlog Clarification
PostPosted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:39 pm 
Offline
Forum Members
Forum Members
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:25 am
Posts: 52
Location: Victoria, BC
Calguy has fixed the browsecat with non-pretty urls issue in svn.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Luoti


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Arvixe - A CMSMS Partner