0.13 Beta4 Released!

Ted · **Posted:** Wed May 10, 2006 1:34 am

Posted to the front page a few minutes ago.

Quote:

Last one, I promise!

This just fixes a few bugs and adds a few more performance fixes. Safe mode users shouldn't have a problem anymore and this version is required to test out the new Comments functionality. Please test it and make sure it's stable and I'll release it early next week.

Thanks!

Basically, I did this because I'm out of town for a long weekend. I didn't want to release it and then leave, just in case there are any problems.

This release adds a few more bug fixes and performance tweaks. I consider it to be release ready, but we just need to be sure. Please test it if you have time.

This version will work with the svn release of Comments that people have been talking about. I'll see if I can get a beta release of it together tomorrow afternoon, as I really don't have time at the moment to do it.

Thanks again! Hopefully we can release 0.13 next Tuesday or Wednesday.

Dr.CSS · **Posted:** Wed May 10, 2006 2:07 am

does the svn release of Comments install like a regular Module?
and where to get it?

mark

cyberman · **Posted:** Wed May 10, 2006 4:36 am

maksbud wrote:

does the svn release of Comments install like a regular Module?

I think so ...

Quote:

and where to get it?

Go to comments project link svn and then to [Download The Nightly SVN Tree Snapshot]

.

Dr.CSS · **Posted:** Wed May 10, 2006 5:13 am

tracked it down already installed both, don't see much diff. with either, thought' Notes: 'Add a comment' link moved to the template.' ? know how? help button shows same thing, no changes there, clean install on Comments,,

mark

cyberman · **Posted:** Wed May 10, 2006 12:39 pm

Admin panel is not xhtml valid. In most of admin pages the doctype declaration is missed. The biggest thing I got from listcontent.php - 1 error and 35 warnings.

Ted · **Posted:** Wed May 10, 2006 12:41 pm

Strange. The doctype WAS there (I thought). I'll look into it sometime today.

Elijah Lofgren · **Posted:** Wed May 10, 2006 2:09 pm

maksbud wrote:

tracked it down already installed both, don't see much diff. with either, thought' Notes: 'Add a comment' link moved to the template.' ? know how? help button shows same thing, no changes there, clean install on Comments,,

mark

I don't think Ted updated the help file. But I did test it out and now it works to comment on news articles! ;D
Here's how:

Quote:

(22:14:47) Ted: And then toss something like {cms_module
module='comments' modulename='News' pageid=$entry->id moderate='1'} in
the bottom of your News detail template

Russ · **Posted:** Thu May 11, 2006 8:17 am

Nice one Ted

I see you've added hierachy path and id to the database, I presume there is some elequent way to return this data say of a full path?

piSearch has stopped working though, it never seems to return, at least in my local copy.

No other problems as yet...

Funky

Dr.CSS · **Posted:** Thu May 11, 2006 9:47 am

do we still put this {cms_module module="comments"} in the template to get comments?

latest CMSMS CMS Made Simple 0.13-beta3 "Canary"

comments shows this ' Comments 1.5 ' but it's the latest,,

mark

Piratos · **Posted:** Thu May 11, 2006 9:52 am

Quote:

piSearch has stopped working though

He

?

It works very fine with postgresql, mysql, mysqli AND SQLITE !

[attachment deleted by admin]

Ron@Spikecity · **Posted:** Thu May 11, 2006 9:53 am

Ted,

This gets somewhat confusing as the online zip and tarball have beta4 in the filename ?

Not that I mind that much as long as we talk about the same beta that needs testing ;D

Maarten · **Joined:** Sat May 06, 2006 9:52 am **Posts:** 84

Spikecity wrote:

Ted,

This gets somewhat confusing as the online zip and tarball have beta4 in the filename ?

Not that I mind that much as long as we talk about the same beta that needs testing

There is a Beta 4 out now.

This is what Piratos said in the german forumpart

Quote:

Die Beta 4 ist ein Witz:

Das wurde geändert (von 0.3 auf 0.4)

Von
if(ereg("Gecko/20051111", $_SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"])) $ok = true; //Maybe WRONG

auf

if(ereg("Gecko", $_SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"])) $ok = true; //Maybe WRONG

im FCKEditor Module.

Ron@Spikecity · **Posted:** Thu May 11, 2006 11:20 am

Maarten wrote:

Spikecity wrote:

Ted,

This gets somewhat confusing as the online zip and tarball have beta4 in the filename ?

Not that I mind that much as long as we talk about the same beta that needs testing

There is a Beta 4 out now.

This is what Piratos said in the german forumpart

Quote:

Die Beta 4 ist ein Witz:

Das wurde geändert (von 0.3 auf 0.4)

Von
if(ereg("Gecko/20051111", $_SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"])) $ok = true; //Maybe WRONG

auf

if(ereg("Gecko", $_SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"])) $ok = true; //Maybe WRONG

im FCKEditor Module.

Looking at your quote from the German board it seems beta 4 is mentioned as a joke (witz) and Ted normally very consequently starts a new thread for every new beta no matter what the time between them is.
So in that context I was wondering what is out of sync here, the beta cycle or the board

Piratos · **Posted:** Thu May 11, 2006 11:41 am

Here is the 0.13 Beta4 WITH SQLITE SUPPORT from me.

http://piratos.byethost33.com/uploads/0134.ZIP

Now my old Projekt PW is closed.

Ted · **Posted:** Thu May 11, 2006 12:15 pm

Sorry, I didn't start a new thread because there were really no changes except for the security patch. I'll update the title of the thread to beta4 instead now.

0.13 Beta4 Released!

Who is online